Lunch Shoppe

A place for much random randomness... 
Filed under

thoughts

 

How To Rise Fast At Work: A True Story

This article is interesting as it gets to what Michel Foucault calls the practice of the self and the moral subject: a good ruler is one who has ruled himself and his desires. In this example, Mark has controlled his desires. Even though he might want a promotion he is not actively seeking that position he is concerned with his co-workers in terms of helping the "family". He wants to make things more efficient and help his family out.

Ted on the other hand is concerned with himself and how he is going to succeed. He is not concerned with others at all, he is not concerned about family as much as he is concerned about getting the most love.

The difference here is that Mark will do things that people are going to think is stupid, but Mark is also disciplined and controls his desires. He is not trying to promote himself. He is in essence ruling because he shows no desire to rule, but to improve people's lives. Ted can't be seen as doing the same.

Power is best in the hands of those who don't actually rule or have ruled themselves. Only when a person has ruled themselves and their desires can they effect a change. Funny where Foucault's power relations are seen.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   foucault   thoughts  

Comments [0]

Twitter and the Protest

Today I used Twitter to update and to understand what was going on at the Wheeler Hall Barricade Strike. I finally understood what the fuss is over twitter! It was a great way to disseminate information and be able to follow others who were also spreading information. I was able to understand what was happening because of people who were able to tweet within Wheeler Hall as well as people who were close to the information. I was able to understand what people wanted us to do even when the megaphones sucked and I wan't able to hear what the speakers were saying. I was able to read about what happened on different parts of the barricades when things go rough. All of these were important in giving me an accurate portrait of the protest even when the word on the ground was inaccurate. 

Being able to see a picture from the inside of an occupation from as student who is part of that occupation is pretty powerful!
 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   new media   thoughts  
Posted from Berkeley, CA

Comments [0]

Individual First, Social Next

As I have been building abooklog I realized something, the most important need that it fulfills is for simplifying my notetaking of books. I can add all the social networking features I want and call it asocialbooklog, but I am taking a different approach. Abooklog right now fulfills the utility of an individual and has zero social features as I haven't been focusing on them as of yet.

I have been working on getting those features which make an individual's life much easier. I am thinking about how to convey information as simple as possible to the user. I am allowing the individual to set goals (especially if your a bad a reader as I am). All this in the end will I hope make interacting with abooklog quite easy to use.

There is something to be gained from this. With all the focus on social this and social that people forget that there needs to be a core idea on which to build a social network on top of. There needs to be a core idea which has to be done right and you can bolt as much social soup on top as you want.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   coding   thoughts  

Comments [0]

Why the future doesn't need us. By Bill Joy

I decided it was time to talk to my friend Danny Hillis. Danny became famous as the cofounder of Thinking Machines Corporation, which built a very powerful parallel supercomputer. Despite my current job title of Chief Scientist at Sun Microsystems, I am more a computer architect than a scientist, and I respect Danny's knowledge of the information and physical sciences more than that of any other single person I know. Danny is also a highly regarded futurist who thinks long-term - four years ago he started the Long Now Foundation, which is building a clock designed to last 10,000 years, in an attempt to draw attention to the pitifully short attention span of our society. (See "Test of Time,"Wired 8.03, page 78.)

So I flew to Los Angeles for the express purpose of having dinner with Danny and his wife, Pati. I went through my now-familiar routine, trotting out the ideas and passages that I found so disturbing. Danny's answer - directed specifically at Kurzweil's scenario of humans merging with robots - came swiftly, and quite surprised me. He said, simply, that the changes would come gradually, and that we would get used to them.

As we build more and more computers that touch every aspect of our lives we will be creating a Matrix like environment. But unlike the Matrix in which humans and robots compete the reason for our enslavement will be our free will.

At the current rate we are going we are decimating the world and its creatures, but if we are given the choice of actually making ourselves a part of an abstraction removed from what is real we will choose it! In such a condition we will not be subjected to the pains of our bodies or our surrounding conditions, we will in effect become Gods creating our own paradise.

Heaven or hell, as the prophets of the past have described it, is there once we die and leave the body. What we are creating now is a system in which we the human body can perish as long as the mind survives. We are no longer creating a system in which we are subject to the whims of nature, but in which we can subdue nature and live in whatever conditions we may please. We might create a perfect abstraction, but even abstractions fail at a certain point.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   singularity   thoughts  

Comments [0]

Road to Legalization

I was reading this article in the New York Times about how people in general seem to have moved away from illegal P2P like BitTorrent to more legit forms of accessing media. Analyzing my own behavior I have to agree! I was in 8th grade when Napster came out back in 2000. I was using dial up on NetZero (which was slow enough as it was even on 56k modems), but I would saturate my connection downloading music. Piracy was my entry into the world of music. The release of Napster made me completely skip the whole CD stage back when people were just getting off tapes to move to CDs. I have to admit I have bought at most two or three music CDs total in my life (but I am sure I made it up by going to a bunch of concerts for the bands I like most). I used to download a lot of music to say the least, but the last couple years I have slowly dwindled my downloads to almost nothing.


In the last two to three years I have been much more inclined to use services like last.fm and Pandora for listening to music. They do a great job of giving a variety of choice to actually listen to music. Further, I have also gone to using Hulu for watching TV shows (which are all of Simpsons, Daily Show, The Office) where before I used to download the torrents. It has just become easier to use these online sources to attain legal music and video. It just seems that it's a lot more convenient to wait for the show to come online and then watching it, even with advertising, than it is to download the thing off BitTorrent. For BitTorrent, I have to find the correct torrent and all that jazz, where I can just find the correct one easily on Hulu.

This is basically my path:
  1. Napster
  2. Kazaa
  3. Morpheous
  4. BitTorrent
  5. last.fm
  6. Pandora
  7. Hulu

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   media   thoughts  

Comments [0]

"Without gods, man is nothing!"

This has been hitting me a bit lately. We really are nothing without the gods. By our asinine wish to control nature and have ever more possessions we are effectively spitting in the face of the gods. The problem with such an ordeal is that we are causing ever more problems along the way and are on our way to dooming ourselves from the only home we know.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   thoughts  

Comments [0]

I'm Quitting Drinking

I quit (excessive) drinking of alcohol for a while but this summer led me to return to it. I kept on asking why I was being drawn to it as I was consuming it? What was the root cause of this consumption? There is no need to actually drink. I realized that even one beer tends to give me a feeling of filling a void and that void tends to gets smaller with each additional beer. But what is that void?

The void is likely created by a society driven by the very ideal of economic consumption. The idea of contemporary society, wherever you are, is that we can never have too much of something. We are constantly bombarded with these messages of new wants. A lot of us never even stop to think about what effect this has on us, or for that matter if we even need whatever is being sold (I am no saint I also turn off my brain and am a consumer like most). However, in a system which tells us we can have anything we want any evidence showing otherwise is depressing. We strive for more money because happiness is one more dollar away. We, however, are not going to have everything we want and life doesn't follow the whims of a capitalistic market. Therefore, the only way it seems that we are able to hide this void is by filling it with something which makes us lose sense of it.

I feel a need (not a want, but a genuine need) to drink after a long day's work. Maybe this is due to the many worries that have been created through the very nature of being in a  system idealizing consumption. Whether we like it or not, when we sell our time to the system we automatically become slaves to it. In this context alcohol becomes another form of consumption in which we are being sold an escape. By the very act of buying alcohol we are consuming something sold as a happiness in a bottle which actually doesn't exist. (Maybe this is what Aladdin was about. Happiness was sold as the Genie in the lamp, but the effect of that was not happiness. It was more problems due to the perception of happiness. Only when Aladdin was free of the Genie is he happy again.).

I wonder if this is why alcoholism and drug use are such a prevalent part of our society and why prohibition never worked. By selling ourselves into a system which drives itself on consumption we also need to be sold an "escape" and alcohol effectively plays that role. I think I've had it with being sold that lie, even by buying one beer I am making my self a consumer to that happiness in a bottle. Because of that reason I am going to quit drinking.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   thoughts  

Comments [1]

Bondage of Time

Time is money, time is relative, time passes. I feel that I am bound by time especially when I am working. This is a ritual I find myself under. When I work I tend to wear a watch, but when I am not working a watch doesn't become necessary. Work is not a condition under which we sell a product or even a service, but it's time we sell. It is seen that a person who does not work is not bound by time, but someone who is not bound by time is seen as unproductive, a bum, a person not fulfilling societal needs.

Bondage to time is such a unique trait of capitalism. We can be doing the worst thing in the world, working for a system that you don't support, but in the time that you work you are bound to someone else and in effect it is actually okay to do whatever is necessary. Even if you work for yourself at a startup, you are bound to the notion of putting your time into creating something for someone else. Time becomes such an issue as to result in making a person's success determinable to it. Essential a person's worth is no longer determined by how moral or good they are, but how much their time is worth.

We have come to a stage where a person can choose what he wants do with his time, but we also have reached a point where time is lost to us. If the US is to be an example the effects of time on society has been vast with depression, divorce, obesity all being a result of time. Given a finite number of hours a day, there are many things that are striving to steal out time, a person skilled at slicing tasks between many things is a person who is thought to be most worthy. However, this is a lifestyle that a human is not made for. It makes us unfulfilled, lost, and in a sense jailed. We are slaves of time.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   thoughts  

Comments [0]

On Thinking About Coding

I find that it's easier to just code something up than to constantly think about coding something up. That is just get something working and interate, don't worry if the code is shit and looks ugly. Just get it working even if it does the bare minimum and add features based on that. This is especially great with tools like git which allow you to iterate rapidly, test out features in new branches and try out new things. By constantly thinking about coding you don't really accomplish much and have nothing to show for all that thinking. However, that isn't to say there isn't a place for thinking especially when dealing with hard algorithmic problems, but when I define coding here it is stuff that scratches a personal itch not something that will solve the Traveling Salesman problem or creating Hal. (Though in most cases you can get away with 2^n algorithms with those...)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   coding   thoughts  

Comments [0]

American Failed Icon: General Motors

GM is filing for bankrupcy and thus has huge symoblic significance for a
generation of Americans. The company which once had 50% of the market
for cars has been declining since the 80s due to many factors including:
lack of innovation, poor quality cars, mismanagement, too many brands,
and the unions.
 
It would have been great if the company were allowed to fail, but it
also falls under the too big to fail criteria that is given. The shitty
products that have been coming from that company does not deserve being
saved and hopefully the bankrupcy will allow foreign companies which
tend to be better run to salvage the company for parts (e.g factories,
etc.).
 
In this case the lack of concessions that the unions themselves were
unwilling to take caused the company to be too bureaucratic, relying
heavily on expensive gas guzzlers to fund the pensions of workers.
Further, most people nowadays buy foreign cars as the stigma of an
American car as poor quality has been stuck. It is interesting to note
however that more "foreign" cars are actually manufactured in the United
States itself mostly through nonunionized workers in the South.
 
GM signified an ideal of Americanism which is now gone. It was an
arrogance bred through Reganomics (man seriously that guy was a dumbass,
yes, I say it again Reagan is a dumbass) of deregulation, winning many
little wars and considering them successes to larger wars (seriously the
wars that really mattered after World War II, the Korean and Vietnam War
can hardly be considered winning), further the fall of the Soviet Union
left a weight of dominance of being able to do anything in the world.
Well that view is quite misplaced. al-Queida, the group that Ameria
funded to fight the Soviets turned on us, the Chinese own most of our
debt, our education is going to shit with other countries leading the
way in science. All of this is coming back to bite us in the ass.
 
As we were in our eyeglass view of the world with an us versus them
mentality of being a big bully, the rest of the world was growing up. We
can't even get our European "friends" to help us in Iran and Afghanistan
how are we going to bully around now. Even Russia has been regaining
some of its clout.
 
If GM signifies anything it is American overspending, of living above
ones means, in a fake gaudy luxury which is unreliable and expensive and
which signifies a big "Fuck You!" to the rest of the world. If GM
signifies anything it is that there are needs and there are wants, we
were fulfilling the wants by overlooking what we actually needed. If GM
signifies anything it is that even the big can fall.
 
America needs to realize we are not the big bad boy in the lot and that
we live in a multipolar world where we can't just start fights and do
anything we want. I hope that eight years of Bush and Dick has led us
realizing that. Obama has 3.5 more years to go, unless the world ends
like the Mayan say in 2012 hopefully we stand better.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   news   politics   thoughts  

Comments [0]